## Content Quality Rubric (0-100)

### Hook Power (0-25)
- 0-5: Generic, no reason to keep reading
- 6-15: Interesting but not urgent
- 16-20: Strong curiosity gap or contrarian claim
- 21-25: Impossible to scroll past. Specific, surprising, personal.

### Voice Authenticity (0-25)
- Does this sound like a real person wrote it?
- Short punchy sentences? Specific numbers? Personal framing?
- No corporate jargon? No filler words?
- Contrarian but backed by data?

### Value Density (0-25)
- Every sentence earns its place
- Specific data points, not vague claims
- Actionable insight, not just observation
- "I learned something I can use today"

### Engagement Potential (0-25)
- Would someone share/repost this?
- Does the CTA invite genuine response?
- Does it spark debate or agreement?
- Platform-native formatting?